Category: Neoteric Papers
-
Neoteric Papers No. 33 — Common Needs and Accountable Taxation
Shemsizedek examines how common needs can justify lawful taxation while demanding adequate representation, a defensible distribution of burdens, clear administration, and an account of results.
-
Neoteric Papers No. 32 — From Proposal to Public Rule
Shemsizedek argues that accountable lawmaking must preserve a usable connection between proposed text, public reasons, substantive revisions, and the rule finally adopted, while confronting the strongest case for justified confidentiality.
-
Neoteric Papers No. 31 — A Second Chamber Must Earn Its Check
A second legislative chamber earns public confidence through independent scrutiny and an intelligible account of its actions, revisions, and delays. Shemsizedek examines the Federal Farmer and Madison before proposing safeguards for accountable lawmaking.
-
Neoteric Papers No. 30 — Common Action With Visible Limits
Shemsizedek examines how distinct authorities can cooperate through defined mandates, visible decisions, and accountable shared administration.
-
Neoteric Papers No. 29 — Changing Delegations Without Losing Accountability
Shemsizedek examines how delegated responsibilities can change lawfully while preserving public authorization, minority protections, service continuity, and a clear account of power.
-
Neoteric Papers No. 28 — When Local Choices Burden Their Neighbors
Shemsizedek examines cross-border burdens, proportionate common action, local autonomy, and the limits of delegated power.
-
Neoteric Papers No. 27 — Learning Without Making People Expendable
Shemsizedek examines how a union can learn from local experiments while preserving equal standing, bounded authority, honest evidence, and practical correction.
-
Neoteric Papers No. 26 — Common Protections, Different Methods
Shemsizedek examines when common standards require uniform practice and when local alternatives can preserve equal standing and accountable protection.
-
Neoteric Papers No. 25 — Cooperation Without Vanishing Responsibility
Shemsizedek examines how distinct authorities can share capabilities while keeping decisions, records, complaints, and responsibility intelligible to the public.
-
Neoteric Papers No. 24 — A Common Rule for Disputed Boundaries
Shemsizedek examines how overlapping authorities can resolve boundary disputes through authorized decisions while preserving scrutiny and lawful correction.
